What Is B2B2C?
How the business-to-business-to-consumer model powers the next generation of crypto derivatives platforms.
B2B2C (business-to-business-to-consumer) is a business model where a company provides infrastructure or services to another business, which then delivers the end product to consumers. The infrastructure provider (B1) builds the technology; the distribution partner (B2) brands and distributes it; and the consumer (C) uses the final product. In crypto derivatives, the B2B2C model enables infrastructure platforms to power multiple branded exchanges, each serving its own user base, while sharing a common technology and liquidity backbone. This model is fundamentally reshaping how crypto trading platforms are built and distributed.
How B2B2C Works
The B2B2C model involves three layers:
- Infrastructure provider (B1) – Builds and maintains the core technology: matching engines, risk engines, APIs, settlement systems, and developer tools. In crypto derivatives, this includes platforms like perps.studio.
- Distribution partner (B2) – Deploys a branded version of the technology for their specific audience. This could be a trading community, fintech app, media brand, or vertical-specific platform. They handle branding, marketing, user acquisition, and customer support.
- End user (C) – The trader or consumer who interacts with the B2's branded platform, often unaware of the underlying infrastructure provider.
The value chain is clear: B1 provides scale and technology excellence; B2 provides distribution and brand relevance; C gets a product tailored to their specific needs and community.
B2B2C vs Other Business Models
| Model | Structure | Example in Crypto |
|---|---|---|
| B2C | Company sells directly to consumers | Binance, Coinbase (direct exchange) |
| B2B | Company sells to other businesses | Fireblocks (institutional custody) |
| B2B2C | Company powers another business that serves consumers | perps.studio powering whitelabel exchanges |
| Platform | Company creates a marketplace for third parties | Hyperliquid (protocol + builder ecosystem) |
The key distinction between B2B2C and pure B2B is that in B2B2C, the infrastructure provider's technology directly reaches end consumers, just under a different brand. In pure B2B, the buyer uses the product internally. B2B2C creates a shared stake in consumer success: both B1 and B2 benefit when end users are satisfied and active.
Why B2B2C Is Growing in Crypto Derivatives
Several structural factors make B2B2C particularly well-suited to the crypto derivatives market:
- Infrastructure is complex – Building an exchange from scratch requires matching engines, risk engines, liquidation systems, oracle integrations, and security infrastructure. Most teams cannot build this competently.
- Distribution is fragmented – Crypto users are spread across thousands of communities, apps, and platforms. No single exchange can reach all of them. B2B2C enables parallel distribution through many partners.
- Liquidity benefits from aggregation – When multiple front-ends route through a common venue, all users benefit from deeper liquidity. This is a network effect that B2C exchanges cannot replicate through multiple independent competitors.
- Regulatory efficiency – In many jurisdictions, the front-end operator (B2) can operate with lighter regulatory requirements than a full exchange, especially if the infrastructure provider handles matching and settlement on a decentralized protocol.
- Revenue sharing is native – Blockchain-based fee-splitting mechanisms (like Hyperliquid's HIP-3 builder codes) make revenue sharing between infrastructure providers and operators transparent and automatic.
B2B2C in Action: Crypto Exchange Infrastructure
The B2B2C model in crypto derivatives works like this in practice:
- perps.studio provides the whitelabel trading platform infrastructure (B1).
- A trading community, fintech app, or content brand deploys a branded exchange (B2) using perps.studio's tools. They customize the interface, add their branding, and integrate with their existing user base.
- Orders from the branded exchange are routed to Hyperliquid (or other supported venues) for execution and settlement.
- End users (C) trade perpetual futures on the branded platform, benefiting from Hyperliquid's deep liquidity without knowing or caring about the underlying infrastructure.
- Revenue flows back through the stack: trading fees are split between the venue (Hyperliquid), the infrastructure provider (perps.studio), and the distribution partner (operator).
This creates a sustainable ecosystem where each participant focuses on their core competency: technology, distribution, or trading.
Advantages for Each Participant
The B2B2C model creates value for all three layers:
For infrastructure providers:
- Scale through multiple distribution partners without building consumer-facing marketing.
- Revenue from the aggregate volume of all partners.
- Network effects—more partners mean more volume, which improves liquidity for everyone.
For distribution partners (operators):
- Launch a trading platform without building exchange infrastructure.
- Monetize existing audiences through trading fees.
- Focus on brand, community, and user experience rather than technology.
For end users:
- Access perpetual futures through a platform tailored to their community or use case.
- Benefit from shared liquidity (deeper books, tighter spreads).
- Non-custodial trading (when the underlying venue supports it).
Challenges of the B2B2C Model
While powerful, the B2B2C model has challenges:
- Brand control – The infrastructure provider must balance standardization (for reliability) with customization (for partner differentiation). Too rigid, and partners cannot differentiate; too flexible, and quality control suffers.
- Attribution and analytics – Properly tracking which partner drove which volume and ensuring accurate fee-splitting requires robust attribution systems.
- Support escalation – End users contact the B2 (operator) for support, but technical issues may require B1 (infrastructure) involvement. Clear escalation paths are essential.
- Regulatory complexity – The regulatory treatment of each layer in the B2B2C chain varies by jurisdiction. Clarity on who holds what responsibilities is critical.
- Dependency risk – Both B2 and C depend on B1's infrastructure. If the infrastructure provider experiences downtime or discontinues the product, all downstream partners are affected.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does B2B2C stand for?
B2B2C stands for business-to-business-to-consumer. It describes a model where one company (B1) provides infrastructure to another company (B2), which then delivers the product to end consumers (C). The infrastructure provider enables multiple distribution partners to serve their own audiences using shared technology.
How does B2B2C apply to crypto exchanges?
In crypto, B2B2C means an infrastructure provider (like perps.studio) builds exchange technology that multiple operators deploy as branded platforms. Each operator serves their own user base, while orders are routed to a common execution venue. This gives operators a fast path to market and users access to deep shared liquidity.
What is the difference between B2B2C and whitelabel?
Whitelabel is a specific implementation of the B2B2C model. In whitelabel, the B2 (operator) takes the B1's (provider's) product, rebrands it, and offers it to consumers. B2B2C is the broader business model concept; whitelabel is one of the most common ways to execute it in practice.
How do B2B2C partners make money?
In crypto derivatives B2B2C, the distribution partner (operator) typically earns revenue through trading fee markups, fee-sharing arrangements with the execution venue, and premium services offered to their users. The infrastructure provider earns through SaaS fees, revenue shares, or per-volume charges from the operators.
Is B2B2C better than building a direct B2C exchange?
For most teams, yes. Building a B2C exchange requires massive investment in infrastructure, liquidity, compliance, and security. B2B2C lets teams leverage existing infrastructure and focus on distribution. The trade-off is less control over the technology stack. B2C is only preferable for well-funded teams with deep technical capabilities and a long-term infrastructure vision.
Ready to launch your exchange?
perps.studio gives you the infrastructure to deploy a fully branded perpetual futures exchange in minutes.