Migrate from Jupiter Perps to perps.studio

Why Migrate from Jupiter Perps to perps.studio

Jupiter Perps benefits from Jupiter's ecosystem, but teams building branded exchanges face fundamental limitations:

• Order book vs JLP pool model: Jupiter Perps uses the JLP (Jupiter Liquidity Pool) model where traders trade against a shared pool. perps.studio routes through Hyperliquid's fully on-chain order book with real price discovery, true limit orders, and visible market depth.
• Cross-ecosystem appeal: Jupiter Perps is Solana-native, limiting your reach to the Solana user base. perps.studio operates on Hyperliquid's L1 and is EVM-compatible, accessing the much larger EVM ecosystem of wallets and users.
• No whitelabel product: Jupiter does not offer whitelabel infrastructure. Building a branded exchange on Jupiter Perps requires extensive custom development with no native support for custom domains, branding, or operator tools.
• Independent liquidity: JLP pool liquidity depends on pool depositors and can be affected by utilization rates. Hyperliquid's order book liquidity comes from professional market makers and regularly exceeds $5B+ in daily volume.
• Full operator infrastructure: perps.studio provides native revenue sharing, referral programs, sub-accounts, vault management, and one-click trading. None of these are available as whitelabel features on Jupiter Perps.

Architecture Comparison: Jupiter Perps vs perps.studio

This migration involves a chain transition (Solana to Hyperliquid) in addition to the trading model shift (pool to order book).

The most significant change is the ecosystem shift from Solana to Hyperliquid's EVM-compatible L1. This broadens your potential user base significantly but requires careful planning for wallet transition communications.

What Changes vs What Stays the Same

What stays the same

• Core trading functionality: leveraged longs, shorts, stop-losses, take-profits
• USDC as the primary margin and settlement asset
• Non-custodial, on-chain trading model
• Your brand identity, community, and user base
• Fundamental perpetual futures mechanics: funding rates, liquidations, leverage

What changes

• Wallet ecosystem: Users transition from Solana wallets (Phantom, Solflare) to EVM wallets (MetaMask, Rabby, WalletConnect). This is the most significant user-facing change.
• Execution model: Trading shifts from pool-based (JLP) to order book execution. Users gain true limit orders, visible market depth, and tighter spreads.
• Network: All trading activity moves from Solana to Hyperliquid's L1.
• Margin modes: Users gain cross margin and portfolio margin alongside isolated margin.
• Market selection: Dramatic expansion from approximately 15-25 pairs to 150+ perpetual futures markets.
• Fee structure: Moves from Jupiter Perps' fixed fee model to a maker/taker structure.
• Operator tools: You gain access to perps.studio's full operator dashboard for revenue, referrals, and platform management.

Step-by-Step Migration Process

Phase 1: Platform Setup (Days 1-3)

• Create your perps.studio operator account and configure workspace
• Set up custom domain with DNS configuration and SSL
• Upload brand assets and configure visual theme
• Define fee structures and revenue sharing parameters
• Set up referral program tiers

Phase 2: Exchange Configuration (Days 3-7)

• Curate your market selection from 150+ available pairs
• Customize the trading terminal layout, charting defaults, and order panel
• Configure margin mode options and leverage limits
• Set up sub-account and vault management features
• Enable one-click trading for streamlined UX

Phase 3: Testing and Integration (Days 7-11)

• Execute comprehensive testing across all order types and trading pairs
• Test EVM wallet connections across MetaMask, Rabby, and WalletConnect
• Migrate any API integrations to perps.studio's endpoints
• Verify revenue sharing and referral tracking calculations
• Run load testing during high-volatility periods to validate performance

Phase 4: User Migration (Days 11-16)

• Publish detailed migration guides covering the Solana-to-EVM wallet transition
• Provide step-by-step USDC bridging instructions (Solana to Hyperliquid)
• Launch perps.studio exchange while maintaining Jupiter Perps access temporarily
• Offer migration incentives (reduced fees, referral bonuses) for early adopters
• Monitor onboarding metrics and provide dedicated support
• Sunset Jupiter Perps integration after validation

Managing the Solana to EVM Wallet Transition

The wallet ecosystem transition is the most significant aspect of this migration from a user experience perspective. Here's how to handle it effectively:

• Most traders already have EVM wallets: The majority of active crypto traders use multiple ecosystems. Survey your user base, but don't assume they're Solana-only. Many already have MetaMask or similar EVM wallets ready to use.
• Provide clear wallet setup guides: For users who are primarily Solana-native, create step-by-step guides for installing MetaMask or Rabby and securing their wallets. Keep instructions simple and visual.
• Simplify the fund transfer process: Document the exact steps for bridging USDC from Solana to Hyperliquid. Recommend specific bridge providers and expected timelines. Consider creating video tutorials for complex bridging routes.
• Multi-wallet support communication: perps.studio supports WalletConnect, which allows connection from dozens of wallet providers. Emphasize this flexibility in your migration communications.
• Offer direct support: Consider hosting live migration support sessions (Discord calls, Telegram groups) during the transition period to help users who need real-time assistance.

The wallet transition is a one-time friction point. Once complete, users benefit from access to the much larger EVM ecosystem and deeper Hyperliquid liquidity.

Timeline and Resource Requirements

The Solana-to-EVM transition adds approximately 2-3 days to the standard migration timeline compared to EVM-to-EVM migrations.

Total expected timeline: 12-16 business days. The extended user migration phase accounts for the additional support needed for Solana-to-EVM wallet transitions and cross-chain fund bridging.

Teams with a predominantly Solana-native user base should budget the full 16 days and invest in user education materials. Teams whose users are already multi-chain may complete the transition faster.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

• Underestimating wallet transition friction: Don't assume all your users are comfortable with EVM wallets. Create comprehensive guides and offer live support during the transition period.
• Ignoring JLP exit timing: If users have funds in Jupiter's JLP vault, they need to withdraw and bridge before they can trade on perps.studio. Communicate this requirement early and clearly.
• Not leveraging the market expansion: Jupiter Perps offers approximately 15-25 pairs. perps.studio provides 150+. Use this dramatic expansion as a key selling point in your migration messaging. Highlight specific markets your users have requested.
• Forgetting API differences: Jupiter's API is Solana program-based. perps.studio uses a standard REST/WebSocket API. Any trading bots or integrations need to be completely rewritten, not just updated. Budget engineering time accordingly.
• Not testing cross-chain bridging: USDC bridging from Solana to Hyperliquid involves cross-chain infrastructure. Test the exact bridging path you'll recommend to users and document any edge cases or delays.
• Rushing through the parallel operation period: Given the ecosystem change, allow at least two weeks of parallel operation where both platforms are accessible. This gives users comfortable time to transition.